Hahahaha. How’s the noble defense of Ukraine going? You ready for the liberation of Kharkov, man? What’s the strongest currency this year? Which country raked in a $150b surplus last quarter, with an even bigger one pending for this quarter? The economies of Europe and NA are falling apart. Donbas is free. Odessa and Kharkov are coming soon. Transnistria will be reunited. Enjoy your spoils.
As Putin said in St. Petersburg, unipolarity is dead. You see them shutting off energy to Europe? That’s because China, India, etc. are more than willing to buy the difference. And if Turkey & Mexico join BRICS, who exactly will be “isolated from the world,” as you deluded types imagined you were doing to Russia? Over half of the world’s population declined to vote to condemn Russia. Only Western Europe is along for this suicide pact.
As one wise man recently pointed out, the statement “Putin is a [insert obnoxious adjective] murderer” should be a disqualifying phrase. Anyone who utters something so credulous and naive on matters geopolitical should be an intellectual outcast. They certainly belong nowhere near the halls of power…
We are seeing the vast, sweeping damage inherent to relying on these little boys & imposters (like Tony and Jake and Victoria) now. Many, many people warned of this. They were ignored, as usual, by the most hubristic & least talented ruling class of all time.
Lmao. Dolt. It only took several months for a solitary, largely strategically meaningless positive development for you, and you immediately start yapping (as is tradition now).
If you want to address any specific point (you know, like you have a counter-argument or something), I’m here for ya. Let’s hear the case for “DC has no substantive challengers.” Please.
Parroting propaganda points along with the signature "bum with an inferiority complex" pomp of Russian & Chinese outlets is not the same as making arguments. In the agitprop mothership tasked with helping the likes of you cope, they are aware of that. High time you caught up.
>>It only took several months
Even a moderately bright supporter of an army that was supposed to take Kiev in days & needed months to take a steel plant would have been wise enough to avoid bringing up timelines.
>>for a solitary, largely strategically meaningless positive development for you
If it was strategically meaningless, Hodaryonok wouldn’t have made a point to refute that claim on state TV. With a blow by blow of why the development in question is strategically significant.
Controlled opposition then followed with "we need to accept Russia has been losing & absolutely can’t win using current methods and resources."
You’ve once again advertised you’re clueless, so I’ll explain:
That’s how you start conditioning people to accept the fact another 50 000-100 000 Russian men (at a minimum) will be dying in Ukraine over the next few years because Putin thinks he can’t afford to lose an unwinnable war.
Spoiler: He will anyway. Abundant cannon fodder can’t make up for his army’s resources having been syphoned off by corrupt leadership. Just like his country’s, to a point where people outside a handful of big cities would find life in the slums of Victorian London an upgrade.
The EU is certainly having a hard time. It will be for quite a while, but no amount of turmoil there could undo the above or prevent the consequences, "Ian." The destitute, corruption-ridden wannabe empire you’re shilling for has been nearing yet another collapse for years. Putin miscalculated, speeding up the process. The US has stepped in to manage it. Enjoy the ride.
>>and you immediately start yapping (as is tradition now).
You do realize it couldn’t have become tradition had Russia not been falling flat on its face with alarming regularity, yes? Again, someone smart would have avoided stepping on that rake.
>>If you want to address any specific point (you know, like you have a counter-argument or something), I’m here for ya.
That’s like picking a rainy day to scold a weatherman for not addressing your specific points as to why "rain doesn’t even exist, lol."
Don’t include the nervous laughter when typing up your posts, btw. It broadcasts the opposite to what you think it does.
>>Let’s hear the case for “DC has no substantive challengers.”
Contrary to what tale spinners for hire would have you believe, it would take a century for those challengers to catch up militarily and economically and actually become substantive. (Russia was never a contender.) If the US lets it happen, the unipolarity we’ve enjoyed since 1989 will die. By that point, however, the Anglosphere (the US plus Canada, the UK, OZ, and NZ) would have already become the joint pole to rule them all.
You’d be aware of all that if you were well-versed in political economy, finance (the eurodollar system specifically), supply chains, and world history. You self-evidently aren’t, so I won’t be reading any further insights you might feel the overwhelming need to contribute.
Hahahaha. How’s the noble defense of Ukraine going? You ready for the liberation of Kharkov, man? What’s the strongest currency this year? Which country raked in a $150b surplus last quarter, with an even bigger one pending for this quarter? The economies of Europe and NA are falling apart. Donbas is free. Odessa and Kharkov are coming soon. Transnistria will be reunited. Enjoy your spoils.
As Putin said in St. Petersburg, unipolarity is dead. You see them shutting off energy to Europe? That’s because China, India, etc. are more than willing to buy the difference. And if Turkey & Mexico join BRICS, who exactly will be “isolated from the world,” as you deluded types imagined you were doing to Russia? Over half of the world’s population declined to vote to condemn Russia. Only Western Europe is along for this suicide pact.
As one wise man recently pointed out, the statement “Putin is a [insert obnoxious adjective] murderer” should be a disqualifying phrase. Anyone who utters something so credulous and naive on matters geopolitical should be an intellectual outcast. They certainly belong nowhere near the halls of power…
We are seeing the vast, sweeping damage inherent to relying on these little boys & imposters (like Tony and Jake and Victoria) now. Many, many people warned of this. They were ignored, as usual, by the most hubristic & least talented ruling class of all time.
That aged like milk, but then somebody who thinks unipolarity is dead couldn’t possibly produce a geopolitical take that wouldn’t.
Lmao. Dolt. It only took several months for a solitary, largely strategically meaningless positive development for you, and you immediately start yapping (as is tradition now).
If you want to address any specific point (you know, like you have a counter-argument or something), I’m here for ya. Let’s hear the case for “DC has no substantive challengers.” Please.
Parroting propaganda points along with the signature "bum with an inferiority complex" pomp of Russian & Chinese outlets is not the same as making arguments. In the agitprop mothership tasked with helping the likes of you cope, they are aware of that. High time you caught up.
>>It only took several months
Even a moderately bright supporter of an army that was supposed to take Kiev in days & needed months to take a steel plant would have been wise enough to avoid bringing up timelines.
>>for a solitary, largely strategically meaningless positive development for you
If it was strategically meaningless, Hodaryonok wouldn’t have made a point to refute that claim on state TV. With a blow by blow of why the development in question is strategically significant.
Controlled opposition then followed with "we need to accept Russia has been losing & absolutely can’t win using current methods and resources."
You’ve once again advertised you’re clueless, so I’ll explain:
That’s how you start conditioning people to accept the fact another 50 000-100 000 Russian men (at a minimum) will be dying in Ukraine over the next few years because Putin thinks he can’t afford to lose an unwinnable war.
Spoiler: He will anyway. Abundant cannon fodder can’t make up for his army’s resources having been syphoned off by corrupt leadership. Just like his country’s, to a point where people outside a handful of big cities would find life in the slums of Victorian London an upgrade.
The EU is certainly having a hard time. It will be for quite a while, but no amount of turmoil there could undo the above or prevent the consequences, "Ian." The destitute, corruption-ridden wannabe empire you’re shilling for has been nearing yet another collapse for years. Putin miscalculated, speeding up the process. The US has stepped in to manage it. Enjoy the ride.
>>and you immediately start yapping (as is tradition now).
You do realize it couldn’t have become tradition had Russia not been falling flat on its face with alarming regularity, yes? Again, someone smart would have avoided stepping on that rake.
>>If you want to address any specific point (you know, like you have a counter-argument or something), I’m here for ya.
That’s like picking a rainy day to scold a weatherman for not addressing your specific points as to why "rain doesn’t even exist, lol."
Don’t include the nervous laughter when typing up your posts, btw. It broadcasts the opposite to what you think it does.
>>Let’s hear the case for “DC has no substantive challengers.”
Contrary to what tale spinners for hire would have you believe, it would take a century for those challengers to catch up militarily and economically and actually become substantive. (Russia was never a contender.) If the US lets it happen, the unipolarity we’ve enjoyed since 1989 will die. By that point, however, the Anglosphere (the US plus Canada, the UK, OZ, and NZ) would have already become the joint pole to rule them all.
You’d be aware of all that if you were well-versed in political economy, finance (the eurodollar system specifically), supply chains, and world history. You self-evidently aren’t, so I won’t be reading any further insights you might feel the overwhelming need to contribute.
Ian looking more foolish by the day